|
Source: FX |
The one thing that the defense and prosecution agreed on was
that former LAPD Det. Mark Fuhrman is a despicable, disgusting, hate-filled
man.
Episode 9 is about the tapes where
Fuhrman, who swore he hadn’t used the N-word in 10 years, was dropping N-bombs
passionately. What hit me hard during this episode was not just him using the
N-word, but
his gloating over racially-motivated police brutality.
The media tended to focus on him using racist
language, when there should’ve been a greater discussion of his racist acts of
violence as a policeman.
He abused the privileges of his badge to target people he
hated, instead of uphold the law. That made me sad and angry. Twenty years later, this still resonates.
While watching I couldn’t help but think of Sandra Bland, Tamir Rice, Alex
Nieto, Mitrice Richardson, Eric Gardener and so many others. I have family
members who work in law enforcement. Cops like Fuhrman hurt our community and
don’t make it easier for police officers who serve with dignity.
Fuhrman managed to piss off everyone in that courtroom: the
judge, the jurors, the victims’ families—everybody. Just listening to how he describes Judge Ito’s
wife you can tell he’s not only a racist, but a misogynist. He pled the fifth to the question about
manufacturing or planting evidence in this case. I don’t believe he handled the
evidence with integrity at the crime scene. His failure and ignorance not to
follow protocol when gathering evidence played a major role in the prosecution
losing.
Fuhrman has gone on to have a successful media and writing
career. I noticed younger people on Twitter were bugging out because they
realized the Mark Fuhrman on FOX News is the same one depicted the other night.
I watched a story on “Good Morning America” about book sales related to the
trial. They reported Mark Fuhrman sold more books in the last few months than
he has in the past five years. Somebody likes him and his beliefs.
By the way,Johnnie Cochran didn’t cross-examine Fuhrman as shown in the miniseries. Attorney
Gerald Uelman asked him about planting evidence. O.J. had so many lawyers. I
don’t even remember the name Gerald Uelman.
I really understood my dad some 20-years ago when he said this
trial was a circus, because that’s exactly how the damn ordeal felt to me. I
don’t mean just the trial, but all of the craziness that went on outside of
that courtroom with the media.
About him nearly being held in contempt, that’s true. Hence,
the title of his memoir
In Contempt.
It
played out differently in real life. My dad felt a cross examination was just
going on way too long ( five days) because Johnnie Cochran was way liberal with
the questions. My dad thought Judge Ito shouldn’t have allowed this to be
ongoing. And so Cochran took a shot at the prosecution’s skills in sidebar and
said, “They obviously haven’t tried any cases in a long time.”
My father popped off and Judge Ito threatened
to hold him in contempt. When my father asked for counsel and Marcia spoke, she
did take off her jewelry like she was ride or die, and would do time if my dad
went down. Except. she was not as dramatic and overt as in the miniseries.
My dad walking out of the courtroom before Det. Fuhrman’s
testimony was not quite accurate.
If my
dad stormed out of the courtroom like Sterling K. Brown’s reenactment, I would
NEVER hear the end of that. Dad told Marcia Clark earlier that day he wasn’t
going to sit through Fuhrman’s BS after the tapes. He walked to the back
courtroom, sat down, then left when Fuhrman began pleading “
the fif.”
One more episode to go…
Gosh I agree with your dad. 5 days of cross examination is ridiculous! People today who didn't see the trial on television have no idea how long and tedious this circus was and Ito had no control over that courtroom whatsoever.
ReplyDeleteAlso, my husband pointed out that Fuhrman has made a few appearances on Howard Stern. Lol.
That's right Fuhrman has been on Howard Stern!
DeleteThis trial went on too long. But again, it was more than a trial.