Hood Disease. I first
heard the term in a recent news report about Oakland youth suffering from post-traumatic
stress disorder (PTSD) on CBS Channel 5 in San Francisco. The violence, deaths
of their peers and loved ones, and poverty are understandably having a
psychological impact on many Oakland youth. I understand. I was born and raised
in East Oakland, where I work in mental health advocacy. According to the
report, Hood Disease is a coined term for PTSD afflicting inner-city youth.
Since the report by Wendy Tokuda, a
nearly 30-year news veteran in the Bay Area, the term “Hood Disease” has gone
viral. While I think this an important issue that needs to be covered, I find
the label offensive. Based on what I’ve seen in social media, others do too. It’s
racist and stigmatizing against people dealing with mental health and emotional
challenges (I’ll explain later).
I emailed my
concerns to Tokuda. As a result of the outrage and misreporting of the origins
of this term by other media outlets, Tokuda said she is not going to use the
term in further reports. In an email to me she wrote, “I am so troubled by what has happened with this term online. We have
already taken it out of our headline.”
Tokuda is a former anchor and has covered
inspirational stories about low-income youth overcoming odds for nearly two
decades. I’m glad she made this decision. However, I’m still curious about who invented
the term “Hood Disease.”
Various media
outlets are either reporting it originated from the Center of Disease Control
(CDC) or Harvard doctors, and citing Tokuda’s story as the source of this
information. That’s not correct.
In the intro to
her report, Tokuda said, “The CDC
said these children often live in virtual war zones. And doctors at Harvard
said they actually suffer from a more complex form of PTSD. Some call it Hood
Disease.”
Notice in her intro, Tokuda said,
“some” call it Hood Disease.” She didn’t say Harvard or the CDC called it Hood
Disease. She Tweeted that she didn’t attribute the source of the term to
Harvard or the CDC. I figured she wasn't referring to the CDC or Harvard, but I think people were confused by the way her intro was worded. So who are the "some?" Are they researchers, psychologists,
people in the community? I
contacted the CDC, Harvard and Tokuda for clarification.
In an email to me from the CDC’s Office of Communications, they wrote, “We are not aware of the reference from the other news story.” I also spoke to Harvard’s Director of Science Communications. He contacted PTSD experts at Harvard, and they said they have no idea where the term “Hood Disease” came from, and will look into it further.
On Tokuda’s Facebook page she posted,
“Mark
Beasley gave me the term HOOD DISEASE to describe complex PTSD among inner city
kids.”
|
Who is Mark Beasley? |
In my email to Tokuda, I asked where did she learn
of the term “Hood Disease” and who is Mark Beasley. Is he a psychologist,
social worker, someone in the community? She didn’t answer my question about
Mark Beasley, but replied, “It came from a person who lives in East Oakland.”
Who is this person in East Oakland
and what are his credentials? I don’t know if Mark Beasley on Facebook is the man from East
Oakland she’s referring to. More importantly, I question why she used a term
from some East Oakland man that she would identify in an email, and not
interview him in her story. And if you notice in the story, none of the people she interviewed said "Hood Disease."
This incident is a reminder of how
the media needs to be more mindful and careful when it comes to how they cover
race, as well as mental health. Tokuda should’ve explained where this term
“Hood Disease” came from. I also wished she questioned why this is a term that
“some” people are labeling mostly poor, Black and Latino youth with PTSD. Looking
back at horrific events such as Columbine, Oklahoma bombings, September 11th
or the school shooting in Connecticut—the survivors of those were considered
traumatized. Their trauma wasn’t compared to a disease. Yet youth of color
suffering from the mental effects of ongoing violence, poverty, racism, etc. are
labeled as having a disease? Calling their PTSD a disease takes the blame away
from the social and economic disadvantages oppressing them.
Also, mental health stigma is a major
problem in our society, and especially in communities of color. Labeling
someone with a mental health challenge as having a “disease” can create self-shame.
Some people don’t seek mental health treatment because of the stigma. Add to
that, lack of education about mental health and access to quality treatment if
you’re living in poverty.
I don’t know who came up with “Hood
Disease” but PTSD is PTSD. Trauma is trauma. Anybody can suffer from trauma
whether you’re an abused wealthy kid from a gated community or a poor kid living
in a violent neighborhood.
I hope Channel 5 continue the series,
yet be more mindful about their language. We need to continue discussing mental
health. Our children have raised money to pay their friends’ funeral expenses,
are awaken by gunshots at night, see underaged girls selling their bodies on the
street, live near crack houses, carry anxiety just walking down the street to
the store, and are wondering if they’re going to be next. Their young minds and
hearts are heavy. But working in mental health advocacy, and overcoming my own challenges, I know people can recover and manage their mental health issues.
No more spreading Hood Disease. Let’s
spread Hope and Healing.
I'm glad you did this follow-up because when I heard this story today, my first thought was, "No researcher said that. She probably got it from a technician in her officer or something." It's incredible to me that a 30-year news veteran would be that irresponsible. As soon as she heard the term, she should have known it would be incendiary coming from a broadcaster, researcher, or anyone else considered to be a professional. And what poor reporting skills to say "some" call it thus and so when she knew she'd only heard it from one man in Oakland. But now the damage is done and poor inner-city youth are burdened with yet another negative label. What can be done about it, I don't know. A petition asking her to apologize on the air would only further cement the term in the nation's psyche.
ReplyDeleteI responded to your post on my phone but it didn't go through. I agree with your comment. I'm not sure Wendy Tokuda would still have a job if she wasn't a news veteran and highly respected. It's been 2 months since this mess. I was speaking at a conference a few days ago about mental health and someone brought this up after the event, and thought it came from the CDC and Harvard. I informed her that was not correct. Last I checked the Mark Beasley I saw on her FB friends list works for the San Francisco Giants.
DeleteWell stated. Poverty, violence, and various trauma affects low income people and especially minorities. Research shows that many minorities are over medicated or experienced forced outpatient treatment. Trauma are often diagnosed as having severe mental illness, and people are on various dangerous psychotropic medications with various side effects instead of having trauma informed care and therapy.
ReplyDeleteYou pretty much summed it up. And forced treatment is definitely an issue. The City of San Francisco recently passed a law legalizing forced treatment. It will be interesting to see how this impacts people of color.
Delete